Invertebrates for vertebrate biodiversity monitoring: Comparisons using three insect taxa as iDNA samplers.

Metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) is now widely used to build diversity profiles from DNA that has been shed by species into the environment. There is substantial interest in the expansion of eDNA approaches for improved detection of terrestrial vertebrates using invertebrate-derived DNA (iDNA) in which hematophagous, sarcophagous, and coprophagous invertebrates sample vertebrate blood, carrion, or faeces. Here, we used metabarcoding and multiple iDNA samplers (carrion flies, sandflies, and mosquitos) collected from 39 forested sites in the southern Amazon to profile gamma and alpha diversity. Our main objectives were to (1) compare diversity found with iDNA to camera trapping, which is the conventional method of vertebrate diversity surveillance; and (2) compare each of the iDNA samplers to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and potential biases associated with each sampler. In total, we collected and analysed 1759 carrion flies, 48,686 sandflies, and 4776 mosquitos. Carrion flies revealed the greatest total vertebrate species richness at the landscape level, despite the least amount of sampling effort and the fewest number of individuals captured for metabarcoding, followed by sandflies. Camera traps had the highest median species richness at the site-level but showed strong bias towards carnivore and ungulate species and missed much of the diversity described by iDNA methods. Mosquitos showed a strong feeding preference for humans as did sandflies for armadillos, thus presenting potential utility to further study related to host-vector interactions.

Trap efficiency evaluation for small mammals in the southern Amazon / Avaliação da eficiência de armadilhas para pequenos mamíferos no sul da Amazônia

The effectiveness of ecological researches on small mammals strongly depends on trapping techniques to survey communities and populations accurately. The main goal of this study was to assess the efficiency of three types of traps (Sherman, Tomahawk and Pitfall) to capture non-volant small mammals. We installed traps in 22 forest fragments in the southern Brazilian Amazonia. We captured 873 individuals belonging to 21 species; most of the individuals (N = 369) and species (N = 19) were trapped using Pitfalls, followed by Shermans (N = 271 individuals; N = 15 species) and Tomahawks (N = 233 individuals; N = 15 species). Pitfalls trapped a richer community subset of small mammals than the two other types of traps, and a more abundant community subset than Tomahawks. Proechimys sp. was the most abundant species trapped (N = 125) and Tomahawk was the most efficient type of trap to capture this species (N = 97 individuals). Neacomys spinosus and Marmosops bishopi were more trapped in Pitfalls (N = 92 and 100 individuals, respectively) than Shermans and Tomahawks. Monodelphis glirina was more trapped in Shermans and Pitfalls than Tomahawks. Species composition trapped using the three types of traps were distinct. Pitfalls captured a more distinct subset of the small mammal community than the two other live traps. We recommend the association of the three types of traps to reach a more comprehensive sampling of the community of small mammals. Thus, as stated by previous studies, we also recommend the complementary use of Shermans, Tomahawks and Pitfalls to account for a thorough sampling of the whole small mammal community in researches conducted in the tropical forests of Amazonia.

A eficácia das pesquisas ecológicas de comunidade de pequenos mamíferos depende fortemente do uso de técnicas adequadas nas capturas durante as amostragens. O principal objetivos deste estudo foi avaliar a eficiências de três tipos de armadilhas (Sherman, Tomahawk e Pitfall) para capturas de pequenos mamíferos não-voadores. Nós instalamos armadilhas em 22 fragmentos de floresta no sul da Amazonia Brasileira. Nós capturamos 873 indivíduos de 21 espécies, a maior parte dos indivíduos (N=369) e espécies (N=19) foram capturados usando pitfalls, seguidos de Shermans (N=271 indivíduos, N=15 espécies) e Tomahawks (N=233 indivíduos, N= 15 espécies). Pitfalls capturou a maior riqueza da comunidade de pequenos mamíferos quando comparada aos outros dois tipos de armadilhas, e uma maior abundancia que Tomahawk. Proechimys sp. foi a espécies mais abundante capturada (N=125) e Tomahawk foi o tipo de armadilha mais eficiente para a captura desta espécie (N=97 indivíduos). Neacomys spinosus e Marmosops bishopi foram mais capturados em Pitfalls (N = 92 e 100 indivíduos, respectivamente) que Shermans e Tomahawks. Monodelphis glirina foram mais capturados em Shermans e Pitfalls que Tomahawks. A composição de espécies capturada usando os três tipos de armadilhas foi distinta. Pitfalls capturou um diferente subgrupo da comunidade de pequenos mamíferos quando comparado aos outros dois tipos de live traps. Assim, como sugerido em estudos anteriores, nós também recomendamos o uso conjugado de Sherman, Tomahawks e Pitfalls para uma amostragem mais completa da comunidade de pequenos mamíferos em pesquisas realizadas nas florestas tropicais da Amazônia.